Frequency is falling. Severity isn't. See the jobsite behaviors that drive the next claim — before it's a claim.
An audited leading-indicator feed from real construction work — each contact-critical interaction with evidence timestamps, per-field confidence, and a documented truth state. Built to drop into your loss-control survey and underwriting file — not to score or discipline workers.
A safety leading indicator, never a worker score.
The product surfaces risky technique for coaching and loss control — it does not rank, rate, or discipline individual workers. Faces and other direct identifiers are blurred before any release, and the release gate structurally blocks any media with an un-redacted face — a posture built to survive the laws an underwriter's counsel will ask about.
Coaching feed, not a worker score
Findings surface risky technique for loss control and coaching — never an individual ranking or a discipline trigger. (We mirror the explicit stance of safety-AI vendors like Protex AI.)
Consent + PII redaction by construction
Capture is consent-based under signed worker agreements. Faces, plates, badges, and names are blurred before any release, and the release gate structurally blocks media with an un-redacted face — a clip that fails the blur pass is rejected, not shipped.
Audio suppressed where law requires
On two-party-consent jurisdictions (e.g. California) audio is suppressed end-to-end and marked MISSING_SENSOR — not silently assumed present.
Ready for disparate-impact review
Findings map to objective OSHA standards, not subjective worker traits, and human review is a structural pre-condition — built with EEOC/ADA, NLRB, BIPA, and proxy/disparate-impact testing (NY DFS CL-7, Colorado SB21-169) in mind.
EMR, TRIR, and DART tell you what already happened.
OSHA frames leading indicators as proactive, preventive measures and lagging indicators as measures of past effectiveness. Construction frequency has trended down for years while severity and the share of inexperienced workers have not — a per-shift behavioral signal is a severity-and-inexperience early warning your lagging metrics can't give you until the loss is booked.
Commercial auto learned this a decade ago: telematics turned hard-braking events — a leading behavior — into a defensible pricing input for rear-end losses. Un-tied-off edge exposure is to a fall claim what hard braking is to a collision. This feed is that bridge for the jobsite.
Detected from egocentric video: elevation height cues, absence of fall-arrest system visible in frame, posture-based SIF potential.
Overhead object hazards, moving vehicle/equipment proximity, and projectile-risk tool use — detected from video + wrist IMU impact signature.
Hand/limb proximity to pinch points, rotating machinery, and unguarded equipment — inferred from video hand-tracking and wrist IMU.
Unguarded panel work, proximity to energized lines visible in frame, tool-to-conductor approach — detected from video scene context.
MISSING_SENSOR, never as assumed-present.Characterized into the buckets carriers actually price on.
The unsafe-condition catalog we characterize findings into was specified by a working carrier actuary — not invented by us. 54 named conditions across 12 insurer categories, each with the visual cues that evidence it and the loss reason a carrier flags it for.
Unprotected edges, missing guardrails, no fall arrest at height, unsafe ladders, uncovered holes, incomplete scaffolds, unstable surfaces.
Suspended loads over workers, equipment swing paths, unsecured materials at height, missing hi-vis near traffic.
vehicle-proximity + blind-spot conditions: additional-sensing roadmap
Unprotected trenches, spoil piles at trench edges, unguarded rotating machinery, worker between equipment and fixed object.
Exposed or damaged wiring, work near overhead lines, missing GFCI in wet conditions, energized work without lockout/tagout.
Missing hard hat, eye/face protection, hearing protection, respirator, gloves, footwear — and PPE present but worn ineffectively.
Slip hazards on walkways, cords and debris in paths, blocked egress, poor material storage, uncapped rebar.
Hot work without fire watch or extinguisher, flammables near ignition, unsecured gas cylinders, blocked extinguishers.
Unlabeled chemicals, uncontained spills, uncontrolled silica dust.
atmospheric/radiation zones: gas-monitor integration roadmap
Entry without permit or attendant; no atmospheric monitoring or ventilation visible.
No spotter near people, unsafe forklift handling, outriggers not deployed, unattended running equipment, visible faults.
Heat-stress conditions without shade or water, inadequate lighting, unsafe manual-lifting posture.
Missing barricades around hazard zones, unauthorized persons in restricted areas.
geofenced exclusion-zone proximity: additional-sensing roadmap
Honest coverage: the feed characterizes what helmet-camera video and motion sensors can evidence. Conditions requiring proximity radar, geofencing, or gas-monitor integration are marked as additional-sensing roadmap above — never silently claimed. What a modality can't see is marked MISSING_SENSOR.
The pilot path: retrospective first, credit decision later.
We don't ask you to price on our word. The pilot we propose is the one your actuaries already know how to judge.
Run on real footage, retrospectively
Consented egocentric capture from a contractor you insure (or our pilot corpus) goes through the full pipeline — no hand-picked clips, no demo reel.
Characterize into the catalog
Findings land in the carrier-specified buckets above, each with evidence timestamps, per-field confidence, truth state, and the cited 29 CFR 1926 provision.
Human review gates every release
A named reviewer confirms or kills each finding before it's insurer-facing. You see the release gate working — including what it rejected and why.
You judge it against your own book
Compare the behavioral frequency we surfaced against the insured's incident and near-miss history. Your actuaries draw the conclusion — we supply the evidence package.
A false positive carries premium and blame consequences — the publish bar is deliberately high, and a pilot that surfaces fifty alerts a day where forty are noise is a failed pilot by our own definition, not just yours.
Every finding plots to a 5×5 likelihood × severity cell.
The standard carrier risk matrix. Each released finding carries its cell, band, and action tier — so it maps directly onto your corrective-action workflow without translation.
Six actuarial fields, every finding, every release.
These are the fields an actuary prices on — the whole pitch in one card. The live report below the gate renders every confirmed finding in this shape; nothing ships until a person has reviewed and approved it.
29 CFR 1926.501Fall protection — duty to have fall protection (Subpart M)161.2s – 162.5segocentric video + wrist IMU · AGREEA finding can't close without a documented corrective action.
Each released finding carries evidence spans, an action tier, the cited OSHA standard, and the reviewer's identity — so it maps straight onto your loss-control survey and corrective-action workflow.
- Evidence span (start ms – end ms)
- Per-field confidence
- Truth state (INFERRED until reviewed)
- Cited OSHA standard
- 5×5 cell → band → action tier
- IRPM category flagged
- Corrective action documented
- Reviewer identity recorded
- Documented corrective action REQUIRED
- Reviewer identity REQUIRED
- Truth state → PROFESSIONAL_CONFIRMED
- Finding enters the released report
A finding can't close without a documented corrective action. The Resolve node requires both a corrective action record and a reviewer identity — structural, not advisory.
Every flag carries its source, confidence, and truth state.
Source, confidence, truth state on every field
Each flag carries the modality it came from, a per-field confidence, and a MEASURED / INFERRED / DEGRADED truth state — the explainability ASOP 23 and NY DFS expect of a model-derived input.
Maps to IRPM credit categories — without double-counting
Behavioral findings map to schedule-rating categories (Management, Employees, Equipment, Safety devices, Premises) that static property data can't supply — each flagged not to be re-counted in the experience-mod base rate.
Conservative / fail-closed discipline
Uncertain detections are routed to human review, never asserted. A false positive carries premium and blame consequences, so the bar to publish a finding is deliberately high.
Accuracy stays honest
Formal precision/recall is PENDING_GOLD until a labeled gold set exists; we never present an unsourced ROI number to an actuary.
Behavioral evidence for the dimensions static property data can't supply.
Each finding category maps to an IRPM schedule-rating dimension. We supply the evidence package for the underwriter's own credit decision — we do not compute the credit.
| Finding category | IRPM schedule-rating dimension | Anti-double-count caveat |
|---|---|---|
| PPE compliance | Employees — selection, training & supervision | verify not in exp-mod base rate |
| Housekeeping / slip-trip | Premises — condition & care | verify not in exp-mod base rate |
| Tools & equipment practice | Equipment — maintenance & safe use | verify not in exp-mod base rate |
| Electrical hazards | Safety devices — equipment & guarding | verify not in exp-mod base rate |
| Falls from elevation | Safety devices — fall protection | verify not in exp-mod base rate |
| Struck-by | Management — safety program & trade coordination | verify not in exp-mod base rate |
| Caught-in / between | Equipment — machinery guarding | verify not in exp-mod base rate |
| Ergonomics / manual handling | Employees — training & job design | verify not in exp-mod base rate |
Every row above carries the anti-double-count caveat: verify it is not already reflected in the experience-mod base rate. We supply behavioral evidence; the underwriter applies the credit.
Video coaching already links leading behaviors to lagging losses.
We cite industry precedent as context, not as our own outcome. Each figure below is the insurer's or vendor's own reported result — attributed, dated, and linked so you can read the source yourself; none is an independently audited number, and none is ours. Our own loss-reduction number stays validation-in-progress until a real peer baseline exists, and formal precision/recall remains PENDING_GOLD.
External precedent only. These are published outcomes from other video-analytics programs, cited so you can verify them. They are not our measured outcome and are not a projection of this product's effect on your book.
Report under human review.
Safety observations for this worksite clip are being reviewed and face-redacted before any insurer-facing release. Findings stay hidden until a person has reviewed and approved them; the released report appears here automatically the moment review is complete.
Accuracy state: pending gold. Weighted Percent Safe and per-hour at-risk rates stay hidden until release.
Talk to our loss-control team →